In our attempt to insure copyright law adherence, the U.S.
is embarking on passing a law tantamount to other absurd efforts to mitigate
some of society’s nagging problems:
"In Colorado
Springs, a 6-year-old was suspended under the school's zero tolerance for drugs policy when the boy gave another
student a cough drop."
"High school
student was suspended days before graduation for having a butter knife in her
car."
"An 8 year-old
boy was suspended from his elementary school for pointing a breaded chicken
finger at a classmate and shouting "Bang!"
Anyone that flies knows the slippery slope
of overcompensation. The “Stop Online
Piracy Act” or “SOPA” (H.R. 3261) is such an effort to address the legitimate issue
of copyright infringement.
There is little doubt, the electronic age
has indeed opened a can of worms concerning copyrighted intellectual property,
and short of awaking in the morning in a utopia, where all honor the
intellectual property of all others, we must address it.
But, the electronic age has also provided mankind
with access to incredible volumes of legitimately accessible information. True, some of it is erroneous and
questionable. But, if any of my
pre-electronic age research lead me to a brick and mortar library to read, for
instance, “Injustice: Exposing the
Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department” or “The New Road to Serfdom: A Letter of Warning
to America”, this would be enough to show that the electronic age doesn’t hold
a monopoly on erroneous information. Information
isn’t knowledge. From information, one culls
knowledge.
The most important thing that the
electronic age has bought into existence is something the world hasn’t seen
before. This is something that can
correct the conditions that slowed, and often stopped, the progress of worker
dignity through the ages. This is the ability to instantly
communicate, en masse, the plight of the poor and powerless. The internet goes a long way to leveling the
playing ground between the powerless and the powerful. The internet is power. Think Iran, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria,
Moscow, the entire Occupy movement. And
then the on the heels of all of this, SOPA?
The more I read or hear about SOPA, the more
I fear a dilution of the internet that would result in an essentially privatized
internet where all information is bought and sold, and worst yet, intimidating users
from freely navigating the internet, for fear of copyright infringement.
Repressive governments already have their
own “SOPA” of sorts, if the citizenry are navigating the internet in a way
deemed a national security issue; they simply turn the internet off or turn off
access to huge portions of it.
I work in an industry, where due to emerging
e-book technology, great effort is being concentrated to insuring and
maintaining copyrighted intellectual property rights. Leave it to the parties
impacted by emerging technology to first try to marry existing laws to the
newly created issues. Then let the
courts address that which needs arbitration.
Where arbitration isn’t possible within the current laws, then highly
focused laws can, and should be considered, not creating an overarching law to
address this issue.
SOPA is the precipice of a very slippery
slope. The problem is that the times of
giving careful consideration in the creation of laws are becoming less and less
the case. It is much simpler to impose
zero tolerance, which is the hallmark of conservative thought. Just look at the election laws being
enacted in states across the country to address a statistically insignificant voter fraud issue. These laws are commonly regarded as “voter
suppression” laws.
SOPA, in its present iteration, may appear innocuous.
My fear is that given the current state of the politics in this country, this
law could evolve into something that may become commonly regarded as “internet suppression”
laws.
No comments:
Post a Comment